Plato

The Republic

The Republic (Greek: Πολιτεία, Politeia; Latin: De Re Publica) is a Socratic dialogue, written by Plato around 380 BCE, concerning justice (δικαιοσύνη), the order and character of the just city-state and the just man. It is Plato's best-known work, and has proven to be one of the world's most influential works of philosophy and political theory, both intellectually and historically.
In the book's dialogue, Socrates discusses the meaning of justice and whether or not the just man is happier than the unjust man with various Athenians and foreigners. They consider the natures of existing regimes and then propose a series of different, hypothetical cities in comparison. This culminates in the discussion of Kallipolis (Καλλίπολις), a hypothetical city-state ruled by a philosopher king. They also discuss the theory of forms, the immortality of the soul, and the role of the philosopher and that of poetry in society. The dialogues may have taken place during the Peloponnesian War.
425 printed pages

Related books

Other versions

Impressions

    Laylishared an impressionlast year
    👍Worth reading
    🔮Hidden Depths
    💡Learnt A Lot
    🎯Worthwhile
    💞Loved Up
    🚀Unputdownable

    It’s inconceivable how such an ancient book can enrich your ming in the XXI century. For the first time in my life I’ve read a book which contains such vast amount of knowledge: about 4 types of states, human nature, knowledge and justice, order of soldiers. Absolutely worth your time!🥺🤩

    Uffe Tonndorffshared an impression14 days ago
    👍Worth reading

    Very hard to comprehend, but important to understand and know

    ABD OUshared an impression5 months ago
    👍Worth reading
    💡Learnt A Lot
    🎯Worthwhile
    💞Loved Up

Quotes

    Muhammad Bachriehas quoted2 years ago
    let me tell you, that the more the pleasures of the body fade away, the greater to me is the pleasure and charm of conversation.
    Helene Louise Juhl-Olsenhas quotedlast year
    the excessive increase of anything often causes a reaction in the opposite direction
    Peyton Cooperhas quotedlast year
    Would not he who is fitted to be a guardian, besides the spirited nature, need to have the qualities of a philosopher?
    I do not apprehend your meaning.
    The trait of which I am speaking, I replied, may be also seen in the dog, and is remarkable in the animal.
    What trait?
    Why, a dog, whenever he sees a stranger, is angry; when an acquaintance, he welcomes him, although the one has never done him any harm, nor the other any good. Did this never strike you as curious?
    The matter never struck me before; but I quite recognise the truth of your remark.
    And surely this instinct of the dog is very charming;--your dog is a true philosopher.
    Why?
    Why, because he distinguishes the face of a friend and of an enemy only by the criterion of knowing and not knowing. And must not an animal be a lover of learning who determines what he likes and dislikes by the test of knowledge and ignorance?
    Most assuredly.
    And is not the love of learning the love of wisdom, which is philosophy?
    They are the same, he replied.
    And may we not say confidently of man also, that he who is likely to be gentle to his friends and acquaintances, must by nature be a lover of wisdom and knowledge?
    That we may safely affirm.
    Then he who is to be a really good and noble guardian of the State will require to unite in himself philosophy and spirit and swiftness and strength?
    Undoubtedly.
    Then we have found the desired natures; and now that we have found them, how are they to be reared and educated? Is not this enquiry which may be expected to throw light on the greater enquiry which is our final end--How do justice and injustice grow up in States? for we do not want either to

On the bookshelves

fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)